Thanks Warren. Are we support this with our current release?
Rgds
Simon
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:04 PM Leroy Tennison <***@datavoiceint.com>
wrote:
> Before selecting round robin consider the drawbacks - a DNS server being
> down, DNS server inconsistency, an application expecting some kind of
> stateful interaction. Finding root cause with DNS round robin can be
> challenging. I'm not saying don't use it, your situation may be able to
> mitigate/eliminate issues. just do so fully aware of the implications.
> ------------------------------
> *From:* bind-users <bind-users-***@lists.isc.org> on behalf of SIMON
> BABY <***@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 18, 2018 4:39 PM
> *To:* Warren Kumari
> *Cc:* bind-***@lists.isc.org
> *Subject:* [EXTERNAL] Re: load balancing
>
> Thanks Warren.
> I am looking DNS RR distribution. (DNS Round Robin Load distribution).
>
> Round robin DNS is often used to load balance requests between a number of Web
> servers <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Web_server>. For example, a
> company has one domain name and three identical copies of the same web site
> residing on three servers with three different IP addresses. When one user
> accesses the home page it will be sent to the first IP address. The second
> user who accesses the home page will be sent to the next IP address, and
> the third user will be sent to the third IP address. In each case, once the
> IP address is given out, it goes to the end of the list. The fourth user,
> therefore, will be sent to the first IP address, and so forth.
>
> Rgds
> Simon
>
>
> Harriscomputer
>
> Join us at the 2018 Momentum User Conference!
> Register here <http://www.cvent.com/d/wgqknh>
>
>
> *Leroy Tennison *Network Information/Cyber Security Specialist
> E: ***@datavoiceint.com
>
>
> 2220 Bush Dr
> McKinney, Texas
> 75070
> www.datavoiceint.com <http://www..com>
>
> TThis message has been sent on behalf of a company that is part of the
> Harris Operating Group of Constellation Software Inc. These companies are
> listed here <http://subscribe.harriscomputer.com/>.
>
> If you prefer not to be contacted by Harris Operating Group please notify
> us <http://subscribe.harriscomputer.com/>.
>
>
>
> This message is intended exclusively for the individual or entity to which
> it is addressed. This communication may contain information that is
> proprietary, privileged or confidential or otherwise legally exempt from
> disclosure. If you are not the named addressee, you are not authorized to
> read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If
> you have received this message in error, please notify the sender
> immediately by e-mail and delete all copies of the message.
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 1:22 PM Warren Kumari <***@kumari.net> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:01 PM SIMON BABY <***@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Are we support load balancing with latest DNSSEC ? I have a DNSSEC
>>> application with unbound library. Do i have to add any extra configuration
>>> to support Load Balancing?
>>>
>>
>> Your question is sufficiently light on detail that it cannot be
>> realistically answered.
>>
>> What sort of load balancing?
>> 1: Traditional SLB - you hand out one IP address, and have a load
>> balancer widget which shares this to multiple backends?
>> 2: Global SLB - you hand out different IP addresses to different clients?
>> 3: Round Robin - you hand out different IP addresses, but randomly / in a
>> order, not tied to specific clients?
>> 4: Anycast - you hand out the same IP address, but this lives on multiple
>> sites, and routing takes care of getting people to the closest site?
>> 5: Multiple nameservers? Something else?
>>
>> The term "load balance" is very vague / can be applied to multiple things
>> - for all of the above except #2, this should just work without any
>> changes. GSLB *may* require more work, but may not. # 5 is sufficiently
>> undefined that it cannot really be answered :-)
>>
>> What *exactly* is the question / scenario you are asking?
>> W
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Rgds
>>> Simon
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Please visit https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users to
>>> unsubscribe from this list
>>>
>>> bind-users mailing list
>>> bind-***@lists.isc.org
>>> https://lists.isc.org/mailman/listinfo/bind-users
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea
>> in the first place.
>> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of
>> pants.
>> ---maf
>>
>